» » Socratic Logic 3e pbk: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles

Socratic Logic 3e pbk: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles ePub download

by Peter Kreeft

  • Author: Peter Kreeft
  • ISBN: 1587318075
  • ISBN13: 978-1587318078
  • ePub: 1315 kb | FB2: 1660 kb
  • Language: English
  • Category: Humanities
  • Publisher: St. Augustines Press; 3rd edition (January 12, 2010)
  • Pages: 410
  • Rating: 4.9/5
  • Votes: 756
  • Format: lrf lrf txt azw
Socratic Logic 3e pbk: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles ePub download

It is not a new logic; logical principles are unchangeable, like the principles of algebra

It is not a new logic; logical principles are unchangeable, like the principles of algebra. It is more like changing from Roman numerals to Arabic numerals. Aristotelian logic assumes both epistemological realism and metaphysical realism because it begins with the first act of the mind, the act of understanding a universal, or a nature, or an essence (such as the nature of apple or man ). These universals, or essences, are known by concepts and expressed by what logic calls terms.

by Peter Kreeft & Trent Dougherty. Biology Questions and Answers. 31 MB·83,614 Downloads. com for downloading it from there; the download is very cheap Biology Quest. When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know Biology Questions and Answers. 49 MB·15,385 Downloads

The principles of thinking logically can be applied to all thinking and to every field. Logic studies the forms or structures of thought.

The principles of thinking logically can be applied to all thinking and to every field.

Similar books and articles. Socratic Logic . e: Socratic Method Platonic Questions. Peter Kreeft - 2010 - St. Augustine's Press. Socratic Logic: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions & Aristotelian Principles. Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (3):299-326. Dorota Leszczyńska-Jasion, Mariusz Urbański & Andrzej Wiśniewski - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (5):959-986. The Unacknowledged Socrates in the Works of Luce Irigaray. Shaun O'Dwyer - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (2):28-44. Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates.

Modelling Socrates as the ideal teacher for the beginner and Socratic method as the ideal method. Introducing philosophical issues along with logic by being philosophical about logic and logical about philosophy. Издание: 3rd. Язык: english.

Socratic Logic book .

Start by marking Socratic Logic: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles as Want to Read: Want to Read savin. ant to Read. Peter J. Kreeft (P. Fordham University) is professor of philosophy at Boston College where he has taught since 1965.

Similar books and articles

Similar books and articles. Peter Kreeft - 2004 - St. Socratic Logic 3e Pbk: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles. Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions. All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation.

ISBN 13: 9781587318085.

Socratic logic: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles

Socratic logic: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles. Section 4. All of logic in two pages: an overview. This is the shortest and simplest sections in this book, but is also one of the most important, for it is the foundation for everything else in logic. 3 questions you should habitually ask yourself when writing or speaking, and of others when you are reading or listening to them: 1. Are the terms all clear and unambiguous? 2. Are the premises true? 3. Is the reasoning all logically valid? If the answer to all three of these questions is Yes, then the conclusion of the argument must be true.

Book by Kreeft, Peter
sobolica
Decades may pass before this book is recognized for what it is: the most straightforward, honest, and philosophically illuminating logic text in print. It is hard to fathom how rare and useful it is for a man as well-read as Kreeft, and as orthodox, to sift through most historical and modern logic texts for us, and to present all the classic features of logic, and the salient departures from the classic approach to logic. Moreover he does this in one highly accessible, lively, readable volume. This book is even clear (and fun) enough to avoid intimidating an interested middle or high school student. It takes a uniquely dedicated and selfless teacher to 'condescend' as charitably as Kreeft does here- this book is bursting with palpable, intellectual energy on even simple topics, and overflowing with helpful examples on more difficult ones.

This book ought to be also a standard, near-required text for Catholic and Christian colleges. It may be some time before that happens, but it will happen, because it needs to.
The_NiGGa
I've been teaching for 30 years, & have taught undergraduate & graduate logic numerous times, yet I didn't have a fully satisfying single logic text until 2004, when this volume first appeared. If I were on a desert island & could have only one logic text to teach from this would be it. As another reviewer noted, this is the first comprehensive Aristolelian text in several decades. I would add that it is head & shoulders above any I know of from the last 100 years, & also supercedes its predecessors by being aware of, anticipating, & responding to the other streams in logic instruction over the last century, including analytics, mathematical, symbolic, etc. My brother is a professor as well, & last year he described for me how he had constructed an entire logic course curriculum from scratch because he was dissatisfied with the logic texts that were in print & could be ordered by his students. With a touch of smugness, I asked him if he had seen this new text, which I had just adopted for my next excursion in logic instruction. "No," he answered rather hesitantly, "but does it have . . . . " To each of his subsequent queries, I answered, "Yes, of course." By the end of the phone conversation I was sure he was scrambling to redeem the hundreds of hours he had spent in solitary preparation when he could have simply chosen Kreeft's Socratic Logic as the text. If you are a teacher of logic, or desire to learn how to think critically in all areas of study, don't follow my brother's example & devise your own curriculum. Follow mine & use Kreeft. You will be satisfied.
Flarik
Wonderful! I have been waiting for this book to arrive for sometime - I finally got it! The last time books on Aristotelian logic were written was about 40 years ago. Demand for these books diminished because courses in symbolic logic became the norm in universities. I believe David Kelley's book, The Art of Reasoning, is similar in content, but nevertheless differs from Socratic Logic in several key ways. Utilizing the wisdom from the ancients, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, Socratic Logic teaches you how to reason effectively in ordinary language from the beginning and continues the approach throughout the whole book.
The material found in this book is sorely missing in these informal logic, or critical thinking books and college courses today. The hallmark of these is to study a few fallacies and decipher their presence in articles, debates, literature, etc., with very little explanation of how these arguments are fallacious. ("Why" they are fallacious is discussed, but not "how".) Only a firm grounding in Aristotelian logic can teach you "how".
For modern critical thinkers, one of the strengths of this book (there are many) is the chapter on "Material Fallacies". Professor Kreeft includes the formal fallacies as well. He goes through 49 fallacies categorized in an intuitive order and presents them in a "commonsensical" manner- to use Professor Kreeft's word.
Now, symbolic logic is good. However, it just has to be appreciated within its proper context. Symbolic logic is a robust tool for in-depth linguistic analyses and the sciences. In contrast, Aristotelian logic is for the humanities. The author makes an excellent distinction in "Section 3: The two logics". So, if you hear some refer to Aristotle's logic as "basic logic", this may be true with respect to the sciences, but not true with respect to everyday conversation, reading, writing, debate, persuasion, presentation, etc. - all of the skills needed to be an educated person in society. No one (and this is not a knock on symbolic logic) converses with, "If p then q . . ." Symbolic logic certainly does help you on paper for in-depth analysis, but the goal is different and this difference is never stately clearly enough in the college classroom. A frequent criticism you hear about symbolic logic is that it doesn't take into account the "material" or essences of the subjects and predicates in propositions. It just focuses on forms of reasoning. Both are important and this book will provide a firm foundation for learning symbolic logic.
Lastly, for a logic text book, the price is not exorbitant. It is worth buying if you want to study the ancient foundations of critical reasoning!
E-Books Related to Socratic Logic 3e pbk: A Logic Text Using Socratic Method, Platonic Questions, and Aristotelian Principles: