Ethics of Cloning (At Issue: Health) ePub download
by David M. Haugen
- ISBN: 0737743123
- ISBN13: 978-0737743128
- ePub: 1127 kb | FB2: 1608 kb
- Language: English
- Category: Sexual Health
- Publisher: Greenhaven (April 17, 2009)
- Pages: 129
- Rating: 4.6/5
- Votes: 849
- Format: azw lrf mobi rtf
In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning
In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning. While many of these views are religious in origin, some of the questions raised by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well. Perspectives on human cloning are theoretical, as human therapeutic and reproductive cloning are not commercially used; animals are currently cloned in laboratories and in livestock production.
The Ethics of Cloning book.
com's David M. Haugen Author Page. The Ethics of Cloning (At Issue) by Haugen, David M. (2009) Paperback.
Find nearly any book by David M Haugen. Get the best deal by comparing prices from over 100,000 booksellers. Is Media Violence a Problem ? (At Issue Series). ISBN 9780737723984 (978-0-7377-2398-4) Softcover, Greenhaven, 2006.
The use of cloning and stem cells to resurrect life: Robert Lanza at TEDxDeExtinction. Why Can’t We Clone Endangered Species to Save Them?
The use of cloning and stem cells to resurrect life: Robert Lanza at TEDxDeExtinction. Why Can’t We Clone Endangered Species to Save Them? Transcription. music) - I think this is one question that in many ways, I think a lot of people will feel is sort of remote, like what does that have to do with me? Unless they have a pet that they want to clone or something like that, right? But, I think it is important because it's a significant world view issue.
Many people are concerned that cloning represents a dangerous 'transgression' of science. Answered Jul 16, 2018 · Author has 744 answers and 39. k answer views. None as such, in my opinion.
The issue of human reproductive cloning has recently received a great deal attention in public discourse. Cloning of cheetahs (and other endangered or vulnerable species) may be ethically appropriate, given certain constraints. Bioethicists, policy makers, and the media have been quick to identify the key ethical issues involved in human reproductive cloning and to argue, almost unanimously, for an international ban on such attempts. However, the ethics of cloning extinct species varies; for example, cloning mammoths and Neanderthals is more ethically problematic than conservation cloning, and requires more attention.
But there’s controversy over whether and how to continue laboratory experiments to see whether it eventually could work.
Cell donors, for example, might find themselves at the center of a media storm if they are identified as having allowed themselves to be cloned. Whatever one thinks about the ethics of reproductive cloning, placing a ban on therapeutic cloning will not make reproductive cloning less likely. RONALD M. GREEN is director of the Ethics Institute at Dartmouth College and chair of the ethics advisory board of Advanced Cell Technology in Worcester, Mass.